This poster, hung over the foot of my bed, is what I woke up to every morning for the better part of a decade. It's the backside of the poster-sized cover to The Feeding of the 5000, Crass's 1978 debut.
As I've mentioned in previous installments of this series, I came into punk rock at a time when the scene was at a low ebb, reduced to isolated individuals and small knots of like-minded enthusiasts. Historical documentation and available material was thin on the ground.
Occasionally one might come across some second-hand books or music mags or a rare affordable treasure in the used vinyl bins, but for the most part it was a trial-and-error journey through uncharted territory when it came to discovering stuff outside the Clash/Pistols/Ramones/Dead Kennedys back-catalogues...or the hardcore scene, which had had taken a bad turn towards the metallic. Hard-won and incomplete information about bands or styles or whatnot was passed by word of mouth or the occasional expensive leap of import-record buying faith.
In the spring of 1992, I was a twenty year old enthusiast of 80's Britpunk and Oi with a studded leather jacket and a crest of purple hair done up Misfits style. It was stock template punrockerdom -- aggro posturing, meticulous accessorizing, and provocative (if a tad tired) fashionizing -- and I say that without making excuses for or condemning my younger self. It's all part of being young, but even then I was feeling a bit long in the tooth for the game and with little idea where it was all going to lead.
Then I discovered Crass.
I'm not certain what it was that convinced me to give the seminal anarchopunks a listen. Patches, badges and jacket paintings featuring the band's distinctive symbols and slogans were commonly enough spotted around the scene, though the same applied to Discharge, and I never warmed to their stuff. It was more likely my insatiable hunger for material to listen to, combined with my reading some reviews for Crass gigs (written in painfully earnest anarcho-communist jargon) in some old fanzines I found. In any case, I ended up picking up a copy of Best Before 1984, a 1986 retrospective of the band's career, at In Your Ear on Commonwealth Avenue sometime in the late spring of 1992.
It was the most terrifying thing I had ever listened to.
It was twenty tracks -- taken from the band's singles and topped off with a live cut from their final performance -- of hardcore anarchist politics delivered over crude tribal punk riffs and occasionally garnished with experimental sonic effects. Protest music (or political music in general) is an iffy proposition, as the proper mix of art and ideology is difficult to achieve.
Crass never aimed for a proper balance, and let the musical aesthetics take a back seat to the message. Yet on the best of their efforts, the sheer force of their convictions elevates the material past the level of noisy agitprop. Whether on "Reality Asylum," a scathing spoken word attack on religion, or the more traditionally punky "Big A Little A," about non-violent resistance, the sense of outrage is visceral, palpable, and chilling in a way no cartoony shock value nonsense could ever hope to match.
More so than the music, it was the concepts behind the Crass collective that struck a chord with me during that transitional period. The theories, manifestos and explanations -- packed in as booklets with Best Before and Christ: The Album -- concerning the punk movement, anarchism, pacifism, and activism influenced me greatly even if I didn't entirely agree with their views on politics and human nature. (I'd love to think a society could work on the basis of voluntary cooperation alone, but harsh experience has taught me otherwise, and no amount of utopian cheerleading is going to change that.)
It got me to thinking about what my priorities were as a self-identified punk rocker, which I realized meant more than an elaborate hairstyle and dogmatic adherence to genre orthodoxy...which was great, because I've saved a ton of cash since I've quit buying ultra-super-hold hair gel and Cockney Rejects bootleg live albums.
Here are two of my favorite selections from Best Before 1984. The first, originally from a 1980 split single with the Poison Girls, is a pointed rejection of letting the ends justify the means. The second, taken from a 1982 EP, is a sandblast of vituperative anti-militarism which brought down the impotent wrath of Parliament. (An edited news clip about the controversy precedes the track.)
Crass - Bloody Revolutions
Crass - Sheep Farming in the Falklands
Tuesday, September 09, 2008
Albums That Meant Something - Part 5 - Dreams of Last Year's Heroes
Posted by
bitterandrew
at
3:40 PM
Labels: 1992, albums that meant something, anarcho-punk, autobiography, keep on punking
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
19 comments:
Wow. I think I shall be emailing you shortly.
I'm not sure if you're aware of this release, or even of Jeffrey Lewis in general, but earlier this year he released an album entitled 12 Crass Songs, which, predictably, is 12 Crass songs done anti-folk style. It's actually a lot better than it has any right to be.
I can honestly say without a hint of irony that I walk in the shadows of giants xoxox
and my word verification today, ironically is: riechchh
When wages, coercion, threats and the rest are removed from the system, it would have to function on the basis of voluntary cooperation. In a way, for many I am sure, that would be the "price" of freedom.
But where are the safeguards against exploitation in such a system? The problem with trusting in quid pro quo arrangements is that there will always be someone trying to gain more than they give.
Maybe it's me,but with the song women album penis envy , Crass struck me as anti-sex and romance. Sure, they sorta preached "love",but always seemed to say it led to exploitation. Ah well, sheep farming and do they owe us a living are classics.
I always liked the ideas of Crass and i would say, about 50% of the actual tracks, however after listening I always felt like a sell-out as being a teenager in Scotland in the 80s it was impossible to live the way they preached and they did preach. Wasn't until the end of last year when somebody gave me the book mentioned by JC above that I realized that it helped if you had an inheritance to start with as Penny Rimbaud.
A classic track on there label was "No Doves Fly Here" by the Mob. The Serenade is Dead by Conflict is another classic anarcho-punk track.
Drew
Ah yes, for me, the problem lies in the subjective nature of "equality" for how can we achieve anarchistic notions of freedom without equality between races, genders, cultures, etc...? And that kind of equality is always perceived as adequate by those who already enjoy privilege in the larger society, no? Changing that mindset is no easy feat and yet the real struggle at hand. Been there, done some of that, but still at it, for what alternative do I have really? Live in the world as it is? Uh, no thanks. Respectfully submitted with your dissenting views in mind, xoxox
Where are the safeguards against exploitation in the current system? Only those safeguards that are allowed us. You need only look at the practice of off-shoring for an example. Businesses are allowed to exploit the cheap labour overseas and concurrently exploit your inability to effectively fight the job loss when acting alone.
A system based on mutuality would necessitate agreement. Either party would be at liberty not to agree the 'exchange' - whatever it may be. Whereas the current system necessitates enforcement - non-unionised workplaces for instance or sub-prime mortgages (pay up or live on the street).
And gain more "what" than they give? There will be no financial benefit as such and the accumulation of 'stuff' would have ceased to be a past time. Whilst ownership rights would remain, property would cease to be the basis for a speculative accumulation of 'wealth' so a societal interest would have to dominate an individual self-interest based on exploitation (as you put it).
As long as desire is part of human nature, than there will be folks more than willing to exploit those desires.
The current system is horribly flawed, and while the roots are systemic, it is exacerbated by a failure of enforcement of safeguards, which does not in and of itself, mean that safeguards are a futile gesture.
The idea that humanity could excise the worst parts of its collective nature strikes me as unrealistic. At the very least there would need to be a binding agreement of first principles -- the right to necessities, the right to fair treatment, and so forth.
Otherwise you risk a tyranny of the majority, where like collectives and individuals band together to give deferential treatment to each other and leverage over "outsiders."
"You need food more than I need a web designer, so we negotiate on my terms."
That strikes me as the road to feudalism, not towards an egalitarian society.
And what road are we currently on? Is it not exactly that very road? With the "economic downturn" (a nice sugarcoated way of saying that Capitalism is working just fine, thank you!) and global markets in the state of interdependency that they now enjoy, are we not on the way to feudalism for many and 1st world wealth for an ever increasing few?
Safeguards are not the answer. The elimination of ownership allows other thing to unravel. Then, only by resetting priorities, changing minds, altering the standards of what are gains and losses can we unearth the basic humanity of collectivity.
Sorry, but that's the only thing that gets me out of bed in the morning. But, what do I know, I'm just a dirty socialist xoxo
How do you expect this to be accomplished? I don't think pacifism is a workable tactic.
Education is completely non-violent.
You and highlander seem to be coming from two sides: he's for some personal ownership, you're for a communistic system of sorts. And once you educate the people, how do you get rid of the government?
So true - discovering Crass was a pull-focus moment for me, embellished with shifty whispers by those already in the know. Cracking logo, stunning artwork (the Persons Unknown poster is genius)and two fisted tunes. Stunning.Have you heard the Crass/Capt Sensible team up - drop me a line if you need a copy.
Reality Asylum still terrifies me, and I really must by the Penny Rimbaud bio'
Email me Jenny, I've got no way to contact you, we'll discuss my evil plans for world takeover xx
@ Jenny - my idea of personal ownership amounts to the 'things you can carry' and 'the things you can make/create/exchange' kind. You might even 'own' a house (although nobody owns a house even these days unless they have paid their mortgage off). And I would naturally defer to common ownership of the means of production.
You might also find this film interesting or even this Wikipedia article.
@ bitterandrew - I think I might be repeating the 'gain more what' point here but "more than willing to exploit those desires" to what end? It won't be wealth or property accumulation. And whilst I accept your web designer/food analogy strikes a chord with people - there will be somebody else who does need a web designer and will meet a trade. Which, in turn, negates the 'exploiter'.
I think that you approach it with a general assumption that people are prone to exploit others and the current system is where we are. But I would argue that people are prone to assist or work with others and the current system is what has originated the tendency to exploitation.
I also liked a tart's 2nd paragraph of 10/9/08 11:06 PM.
I will agree to differ as soon as you wish to terminate this comment thread as I know we will need people with your encyclopaedic knowledge of comics, and fluency with words, to disseminate propaganda to the masses post-revolution. ;)
Highlander: No need to apologize for trusting in the inherent goodness for people.
"To what end?" I'd answer with whatever perceived advantage they imagine they could accrue. It strikes me as no different than the pro-globalization arguments that assume that all resources are equally important as bargaining chips...even though a petrostate has far more leverage than a place that exports currants.
I just like them because they sound like Sham 69.
Post a Comment