
I haven't done a political post in a while, choosing instead to slip, stumble, and fall into the role of comics blogger, a direction I honestly wanted to avoid. The truth is that it is far easier and less trying on the psyche to crack wise about Namor's swimtrunks or Steve Lombard than to sit down and try to articulate my current thoughts about the present state of events.
Not that there has been anything really worth writing about in the first place. The present cycle of history is caught in an accelerated loop where we've already gone though the fifth or sixth go round of the same shit -- first as a tragedy, then as a farce, then as a tragic farce, then as slapstick, then as snuff porn. When the road out is beyond most people's willingness to comprehend or stomach, it becomes preferable to keep spinning the wheels and get used to the smell of burning rubber...or books...or bodies.
Meanwhile the Democratic-controlled congress has continued to roll over and vacillate, the fourth estate has been preoccupied with Britney's adventures in moving violations, and Bush and Company's surge plan for Iraq is being labeled a success -- meaning the sawdust in the transmission will mask the grinding noises until the next administration drives it off the used pre-owned war lot.
It doesn't look like things are going to get any better in the near future. The frontloading of the 2008 presidential election season, as welcome an event as "Christmas in July" retail promotions, has only succeded in making me nauseous and convincing me that none of the candidates are qualified to lead the nation out of the wilderness.
The Republican contenders have chosen to define themselves through their ever-escalating attempts to out-fascist one another, with the exception of Ron Paul's mix of anti-interventionism (good) and extreme right-wing libertarianism (not good). I wish that those folks pinning all their hopes on Paul as an outsider white knight antiwar candidate would pay a little more attention to the rest of his political positions. (Even if I could ever bring myself to vote for a Republican, his anti-choice stance and support for this misleading bit of legislation puts him beyond the political pale.)
Then there's the Democratic crop of candidates, whose apparent plan for 2008 is to take a tremendously advantageous historical position and attempt to turn it into a loss. They're long on lofty platitudes, short on honest convictions (except Dennis Kucinich, who had to spoil things with his UFO talk), and have exhibited an overall willingness to piss all over the party's traditional base in order to pander to folks who aren't going to vote Democratic anyhow. The politics of principle have given way to the politics of point-scoring by any means necessary, even if it means crazy talk about nuclear weapons use or cozying up to anti-gay religious demagogues, and being "progressive" means "your vote is a given, so suck it up, baby."
In such circumstances, looking for silly or creepy subtext in old comics stories is a welcome relief.
Agent Orange - Somebody to Love (from the When You Least Expect It... EP, 1984) - I originally considered posting The Great Society's original version of this song (which Grace Slick brought with her to Jefferson Airplane when she jumped bands), but it was a little too mellow given my present mood. So an OC punk cover it is, then.
Tuesday, November 20, 2007
when the truth is found to be lies
Posted by
bitterandrew
at
4:35 PM
Labels: cover songs, election 2008, existential dread, idiocy, politics, punk
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

6 comments:
Right on! I have this record. Isn't there supposed to be some monk-like chanting before the song kicks in? Maybe I remember wrong.
ted
The "We The People Act", huh? Wow. Thanks for the info there. I doubt that I would have voted for him in the end, either, but for a while Ron Paul actually sounded like a somewhat plausible candidate. That's pretty fucking scary. It kills me, the way these dirt bags wrap this kind of legislation in some jingoist, fake-patriotic sloganeering. Scariest thing is that people seem to fall for it. After all, who'd vote against something called the "We The People Act"... or the "USA Patriot Act".... Right?
Agent Orange's version is far superior in my humble opinion. Just don't go see them perform it live these days. Stick with the old vinyl and pretend it's still that way. Thanks for a great blog.
As always, nice write-up. But I have to challenge you on one point. I don't construe Ron Paul as "anti-choice." As a hardcore, small government libertarian Paul would be strongly opposed to any government action that limited individual freedom--including a pregnant woman's freedom to have an abortion if she wanted one. And I specifically heard him say in an interview at Google HQ (available on YouTube) that he objected to the fact that religious pharmacists have refused to dispense the morning after pill to women who requested it. For the record, I'm not a Ron Paul supporter, but I do think that an anti-choice stance would be inconsistent with his core message and I would be surprised to learn that he is, in fact, opposed to abortion rights.
From Wikipedia:
Paul calls himself "strongly pro-life", "an unshakable foe of abortion", and believes regulation of medical decisions about maternal or fetal health is "best handled at the state level."(He says his years as an obstetrician lead him to believe life begins at conception...)
Paul's libertarianism is not as pure as it has been presented to be some circles. There's also a very strong advocacy of states rights which in many cases, such as the abortion issue and the We the People Act where it conflicts with the protection of civil liberties.
On a kinda related topic: A friend hipped me to the fact that Ron Paul does not support network neutrality (http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/Ron_Paul_Technology.htm). This would also seem to contradict his credo of protecting and expanding individual liberty.
Post a Comment